Industrial, Production and Manufacturing Engineering Fundamentals

The Seven Wastes in Lean Manufacturing

The Seven Wastes in Lean Manufacturing: featured diagram
Short answer

The seven wastes (Japanese: muda) in lean manufacturing are activities that consume time, effort or resources without adding value for the customer. Identified by Taiichi Ohno in the Toyota Production System, they are often remembered as TIMWOOD: Transport, Inventory, Motion, Waiting, Overproduction, Overprocessing and Defects. Many add an eighth, unused skills or talent. Lean tools such as value stream mapping, 5S, SMED, kanban, poka-yoke and standard work help find and remove these wastes.

Lean thinking starts from the customer’s view of value. Only steps that change the product in a way the customer is willing to pay for add value. Everything else is waste. Studies of typical processes often find that value adding time is a small fraction, sometimes under 5%, of the total lead time. Removing waste shortens lead time, frees space and capacity, improves quality and lowers cost.

Value added and non-value added activities

  • Value added (VA): transforms the product as the customer wants, done right first time, for example machining a feature or assembling a part.
  • Necessary non-value added (NNVA): does not add value but is currently required, such as some inspection or regulatory paperwork. Minimise it.
  • Non-value added (NVA): pure waste. Eliminate it.

The seven wastes explained

Muda7 wastesTransportInventoryMotionWaitingOver-productionOver-processingDefects
The seven wastes of lean manufacturing (TIMWOOD).
Download diagram (WebP)

1. Transport

Moving materials, parts or products between processes or locations without adding value. Examples: forklifts carrying parts between distant departments, multiple storage moves, shipping between plants. Each move costs time, handling effort and risk of damage. Remedies: cellular layouts, placing processes close together, point of use storage, conveyors only where justified.

2. Inventory

Raw materials, work in progress (WIP) and finished goods beyond what is needed now. Inventory ties up cash and space, hides problems such as machine breakdowns and quality issues, and risks obsolescence. Remedies: pull systems with kanban, smaller batches, one piece flow, quick changeovers (SMED), and economic ordering such as the EOQ model where demand is steady.

3. Motion

Unnecessary movement of people: walking to fetch tools, reaching, bending, searching for items. It wastes time and causes fatigue and injuries. Remedies: 5S workplace organisation, ergonomic workstation design, tools at point of use, and time and motion study.

4. Waiting

People or machines idle while waiting for materials, information, approvals, machine cycles, maintenance or the previous process. Remedies: line balancing, reliable equipment through preventive and predictive maintenance, synchronised flow, and multi-skilled operators.

5. Overproduction

Making more than the customer needs, or making it earlier. Ohno called this the worst waste because it generates the others: extra inventory, transport, storage and hidden defects. Remedies: produce to takt time, pull scheduling, level loading (heijunka).

6. Overprocessing

Doing more work than the customer requires: tighter tolerances than needed, extra polishing, redundant inspections, duplicate data entry, overly complex machines. Remedies: understand true customer requirements, simplify designs and processes, value engineering.

7. Defects

Scrap, rework, returns and warranty claims, plus the inspection and paperwork they cause. Remedies: mistake proofing (poka-yoke), standard work, root cause analysis, statistical process control and Six Sigma DMAIC projects.

The eighth waste: unused talent

Not using people’s knowledge, ideas and skills. Engaging operators in kaizen (continuous improvement) is one of the most powerful ways to find and remove the other wastes.

Takt time and lead time

Takt time sets the pace of production to customer demand:

Ttakt=available working timecustomer demandT_\text{takt} = \frac{\text{available working time}}{\text{customer demand}}

Process cycle efficiency shows how much of the lead time adds value:

PCE=value added timetotal lead timePCE = \frac{\text{value added time}}{\text{total lead time}}
Worked example
Given
A machining cell works one shift of 8 hours with 60 minutes of breaks; customer demand is 420 parts per day. A value stream map shows value added time of 6 minutes per part, but total lead time from raw material to dispatch is 4 days of 7 working hours.
Find
Takt time and process cycle efficiency.
Assumptions
Lead time measured in working time only.
Solution
Available time = 7 h × 3600 = 25 200 s
Takt = 25 200 ÷ 420 = 60 s per part
Lead time = 4 × 7 × 60 = 1680 min
PCE = 6 ÷ 1680 = 0.0036 = 0.36%
Answer
Takt time is 60 s; only 0.36% of lead time adds value, so most of the time is waiting and inventory between steps
Limitations
Lead time often varies widely; measuring several products over time gives a better picture.

Lean tools for removing waste

ToolMain wastes addressed
Value stream mappingAll, by making flow and waits visible
5S (sort, set in order, shine, standardise, sustain)Motion, defects, waiting
Kanban and pull systemsOverproduction, inventory
SMED (quick changeover)Inventory, waiting, overproduction
Poka-yoke (mistake proofing)Defects
Standard workMotion, defects, variation
Cellular layout and one piece flowTransport, inventory, waiting
Total productive maintenance (TPM)Waiting, defects

The seven wastes outside the factory

The same seven wastes appear in offices and services. In an engineering department, transport is passing drawings between departments for approvals; inventory is a queue of unreviewed change requests; motion is searching for the latest file version; waiting is a design blocked for a test result; overproduction is reports nobody reads; overprocessing is detail beyond what the customer needs; and defects are drawing errors found on the shop floor. Hospitals, banks and software teams use the same lens to cut delays and errors.

Applying the seven wastes on the shop floor

Start small and visible: pick one product family, map its value stream from order to delivery, and mark every place where material or information waits, and measure how long it waits there.

A practical approach is a gemba walk: go to where the work is done, observe, ask why, and note each waste with the people doing the work. Then prioritise, run small experiments (PDCA cycles), standardise what works and repeat. Measures such as lead time, WIP, first pass yield, OEE and floor space show progress. Over time, focusing on the seven wastes builds a culture of continuous improvement that keeps finding smaller wastes to remove, supported by sound production planning and control.

Frequently asked questions

What does TIMWOOD stand for?

TIMWOOD is a memory aid for the seven wastes: Transport, Inventory, Motion, Waiting, Overproduction, Overprocessing and Defects. Adding Skills (unused talent) gives TIMWOODS, often called the eighth waste.

Which of the seven wastes is the worst?

Taiichi Ohno considered overproduction the worst, because making too much or too early creates and hides the other wastes: it causes excess inventory, extra transport and handling, storage, waiting for space, and delays the discovery of defects.

Are the seven wastes only for factories?

No. The same wastes appear in offices, hospitals, software development and services: waiting for approvals, unnecessary reports (overprocessing), searching for files (motion), backlogs (inventory), handoffs between departments (transport) and errors needing rework (defects).

References

  1. T. Ohno, Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production, Productivity Press, 1988
  2. J. P. Womack and D. T. Jones, Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation, Simon and Schuster, 1996
  3. M. Rother and J. Shook, Learning to See: Value Stream Mapping to Add Value and Eliminate Muda, Lean Enterprise Institute
  4. J. K. Liker, The Toyota Way, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, 2020

Get one engineering email a week

New articles, worked examples and study notes every week. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.

Zenta Engineering

Articles written by the Zenta Engineering editorial staff are checked by our technical team against the references listed on each page, following our editorial policy. Editorial policy.

Related articles