Industrial, Production and Manufacturing Engineering Comparison

3D Printing Technologies: FDM, SLA and SLS Compared

3D Printing Technologies: FDM, SLA and SLS Compared: featured diagram
Short answer

The three most common 3D printing technologies for polymers build parts layer by layer in different ways. FDM (fused deposition modelling) extrudes melted thermoplastic filament through a heated nozzle; it is cheap and simple but shows visible layers and weaker bonding between them. SLA (stereolithography) cures liquid photopolymer resin with a UV laser or light source, giving very fine detail and smooth surfaces. SLS (selective laser sintering) fuses nylon powder with a laser; unsintered powder supports the part, so no support structures are needed and parts are strong and functional.

Additive manufacturing (AM) builds parts directly from 3D CAD data by adding material layer by layer, instead of removing it as in machining or forming it in moulds. It is used for rapid prototyping, jigs and fixtures, medical devices, aerospace components and low volume production. Among the manufacturing processes, it offers unique design freedom and needs no tooling.

The common workflow

  1. Design the part in CAD and export it as STL, 3MF or STEP.
  2. Slice the model in software into layers, generating tool paths or laser scan paths, supports and infill.
  3. Print the part layer by layer.
  4. Post-process: remove supports, clean, cure, sand, machine or heat treat as needed.

FDM: fused deposition modelling

A spool of thermoplastic filament feeds into a heated extruder, which melts it and deposits a thin bead through a nozzle (typically 0.4 mm) onto a build plate. The nozzle traces each layer’s outline and infill, then the plate moves down (or the head moves up) by one layer height, typically 0.1 to 0.3 mm. Support structures are printed under overhangs.

  • Materials: PLA, ABS, PETG, TPU, nylon, polycarbonate, and engineering polymers such as PEEK and ULTEM on industrial machines; fibre reinforced filaments.
  • Strengths: low cost, easy to use, large choice of materials, good for prototypes and fixtures.
  • Limitations: visible layer lines, anisotropic strength (weak between layers), lower dimensional accuracy, supports leave marks.

SLA: stereolithography

A vat of liquid photopolymer resin is cured layer by layer by a UV laser tracing the cross section (SLA), or by a projector or LCD masking a UV light source (DLP and MSLA). The build platform lifts the part out of the vat step by step. After printing, parts are washed in solvent and post-cured under UV light.

  • Materials: standard, tough, flexible, high temperature, castable, dental and biocompatible resins.
  • Strengths: excellent detail (features down to about 0.05 to 0.1 mm), smooth surfaces, good accuracy; ideal for visual prototypes, dental models, jewellery patterns and microfluidics.
  • Limitations: resins can be brittle and degrade in sunlight, supports are needed, and resin handling needs gloves and ventilation.

SLS: selective laser sintering

A thin layer of polymer powder, usually nylon (PA12 or PA11), is spread across a heated bed. A CO₂ laser scans the cross section, fusing the particles. The bed lowers, a new powder layer is spread, and the process repeats. The surrounding loose powder supports the part, so complex internal channels and nested parts can be printed without supports. After cooling, parts are removed from the powder cake and bead blasted.

  • Materials: PA12, PA11, glass or carbon filled nylon, TPU, polypropylene.
  • Strengths: strong, durable, nearly isotropic parts; no supports; many parts nested in one build; good for functional prototypes and end use parts.
  • Limitations: higher machine cost, grainy surface, powder handling, and longer cooling time. Similar technologies include multi jet fusion (MJF).
FDMSLASLSFilamentHot endBuild platePartResin vatPartPlatformUV laserLaserRollerPowder bedPart
Simplified principles of FDM, SLA (bottom-up variant) and SLS.
Download diagram (WebP)

3D printing technologies compared

FeatureFDMSLASLS
FeedstockThermoplastic filamentLiquid photopolymer resinPolymer powder (nylon)
Energy sourceHeated nozzleUV laser or lightCO₂ or fibre laser
Typical layer height0.1 to 0.3 mm0.025 to 0.1 mm0.08 to 0.12 mm
Detail and surfaceModerate, visible layersExcellent, smoothGood, slightly grainy
StrengthAnisotropicGood, can be brittleStrong, near isotropic
SupportsYesYesNo
Machine costLow to highLow to mediumHigh
Typical usePrototypes, fixturesDetailed models, dental, casting patternsFunctional parts, small batches

Metal 3D printing

Metal parts are printed mainly by powder bed fusion (laser or electron beam melting of metal powder, such as titanium, aluminium, stainless steel and nickel alloys), directed energy deposition (wire or powder melted by laser, arc or electron beam, used for large parts and repair) and binder jetting followed by sintering. Aerospace fuel nozzles, medical implants and lightweight brackets are typical applications.

Build time estimate

For FDM, a rough build time estimate is:

t≈VQt \approx \frac{V}{Q}

where V is the deposited volume (part volume times infill fraction, plus walls and supports) and Q the volumetric deposition rate, roughly nozzle width × layer height × print speed.

Worked example
Given
An FDM bracket of 80 cm³ solid volume is printed with 30% infill; walls and supports add 15 cm³. Nozzle 0.4 mm, layer height 0.2 mm, average print speed 60 mm/s.
Find
Approximate deposited volume and print time.
Assumptions
Travel moves and layer changes ignored; average speed sustained.
Solution
Deposited volume = 0.30 × 80 + 15 = 39 cm³ = 39 000 mm³
Q = 0.4 × 0.2 × 60 = 4.8 mm³/s
t = 39 000 ÷ 4.8 = 8125 s ≈ 2.3 h
Answer
About 39 cm³ of plastic and roughly 2.3 hours of printing; real time is often 20 to 40% longer
Limitations
Slicer software gives better estimates including accelerations and travel.

Design tips for additive manufacturing

  • Orient parts so critical loads run along layers, especially for FDM.
  • Avoid unsupported overhangs beyond about 45° for FDM and SLA; add fillets and chamfers.
  • Respect minimum wall thickness, typically about 0.8 to 1 mm.
  • Add escape holes for trapped powder or resin in hollow parts.
  • Use lattice and topology optimised shapes to save weight, a key advantage of AM.

Choosing among 3D printing technologies

Pick FDM for low cost prototypes, jigs and fixtures; SLA for fine detail, smooth surfaces and casting patterns; SLS for durable functional parts and small production runs without supports; and metal AM for high value, complex metal components. Consider volume and cost per part too: for large quantities, injection moulding or CNC machining usually becomes cheaper. Polymers used in each process are discussed in thermoplastics vs thermosets.

Frequently asked questions

Which 3D printing technology is best for beginners?

FDM is usually best for beginners and general prototyping. Printers and filament are cheap, materials such as PLA are easy to print, and parts need little post-processing. SLA is better when fine detail and smooth surfaces matter, and SLS when strong functional nylon parts without supports are needed.

Are 3D printed parts as strong as moulded parts?

It depends on the process. FDM parts are weaker between layers than along them, often 30 to 60% of moulded strength in the build direction. SLS nylon parts are more isotropic and approach moulded properties. Metal powder bed fusion parts can match or exceed cast and sometimes wrought properties after heat treatment.

What are the seven ISO/ASTM additive manufacturing categories?

ISO/ASTM 52900 defines material extrusion (FDM), vat photopolymerisation (SLA, DLP), powder bed fusion (SLS, SLM, EBM), material jetting, binder jetting, directed energy deposition and sheet lamination.

References

  1. ISO/ASTM 52900:2021, Additive manufacturing: General principles, Fundamentals and vocabulary
  2. I. Gibson, D. Rosen, B. Stucker and M. Khorasani, Additive Manufacturing Technologies, 3rd ed., Springer
  3. ISO/ASTM 52910:2018, Additive manufacturing: Design, Requirements, guidelines and recommendations
  4. Wohlers Associates, Wohlers Report 2024, ASTM International

Get one engineering email a week

New articles, worked examples and study notes every week. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.

Zenta Engineering

Articles written by the Zenta Engineering editorial staff are checked by our technical team against the references listed on each page, following our editorial policy. Editorial policy.

Related articles